Slutty Whore, Lucy Pinder, In January 2006 Front Magazine

It’s beyond me why this woman is so damn popular. She is a token hot, white chick w/ big boobs & well…big boobs.

I see porn on the horizon. Enough said.

Here’s rest of the whored-out, soft-porn layout (I think there’s also an article somewhere in there). Also, please have the decency to leave the Bastardly before wanking.

View All Photos ›

21 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Boz
Boz

are those real racks? or got photoshopped?

CATHY R.
CATHY R.

LUCY DESERVES TO GET GANG RAPED FOR BEING A WHORE. LUCY DESERVES TO DIE FROM AIDS FOR BEING A SLUT. I FUCKING HATE LUCY.

CATHY R.
CATHY R.

LUCY IS A WHORE. LUCY IS A BITCH. LUCY IS A CUNT. LUCY IS A SLUT. I FUCKING HATE LUCY.

jim
jim

she looks fanatastic to me big tits great body! What is wrong with that you sad jealous muthas! Oh it may be because you have pussy envy!!!!!!!!!! And as for the sleaze... Thank god for the sleaze! Fanatastic!

anthony
anthony

can u ring me on the 6 of october 2006 for a chat

ciaran
ciaran

well siad jimmy theses people just dont know

Jimmy putting you wankers straight
Jimmy putting you wankers straight

Fools...

Lucy Pinder cant change how a photographer wants her to do, Lucy simply poses looking fantastic and stunning with all real 32G breasts.

This lady has done glamour modeling through a photographer spotting her sunbathing, this lady is not now or ever going into porn.

If anything TV work, this lady is a lady if you knew her you'd agree, but as most of you just wank away and dont give a fuck your opinions are pointless!

Lucy
Lucy

Shes so airbrushed....i dont see why though cus isnt she ment to be naturally pretty? And...i heard shes always had a big chest but...shes had them made bigger right?

bubow
bubow

Most magazines and Front being no exception to the large amount they probably pay for tacky snaps like these, but remember not every piece of work or photo is a true reflection of this girl. She is a glamour model, but a very beautiful one at that. I have also seen her in the flesh in London and she is one of the most naturally beautiful women you will ever lay eyes on. For those who say she is Fugly and computer generated, believe me she aint. And those hooter are every bit as big as they appear to be!!!

If she was my girl I would be one happy, hand wandering dude!

BasketCase
BasketCase

YIKES - she looks like a thin Ricki Lake with big hooters

Pickel
Pickel

the body is rather pleasing

Moose
Moose

I don't see how she's "token" at all. She's a redhead, for one thing, and last time I checked I don't think anyone immediately pictures redheads as being "token white chicks." I think generally a "token white chick" is someone like Jessica Simpson. You know, Barbie.

But in any case, it's interesting that she's not a complete beanpole like a lot of these girls.

Beaner
Beaner

I like that, totally "token." But with huge fucking tits.

Gia
Gia

she would look a lot better with less sleaze.

softer, washed hair & less/ or natural make up would suit her better. her face just isnt that impressive with all that tacky make up on...her body is sleazy looking, not sexy. thats not necessarily a bad thing depending on her purpose.

glimmer
glimmer

..my erection is computer generated....

ok ok again someone gets called sluuty+whore whatever. i want/like some tidbits/info on why this name applies applys.hey this is a gossip site.!!! :)

oh and being about nice enough to leave before wanking. ah this is the bastardly/so whay should worry/do the 'polite' thing ????

and so that i don't killed/no i'm not about to ah what do you call it..wank. but i'm sure she wouldn't be interested in me if we met. but i wouldn't cry much,really.

but when i can't make it with a 'slutty whore' it does cement my loser status. yes ????

sounding off...

Nemo
Nemo

Her face is really fugly.