Marisa Miller Lookin’ Super Hot Walking Around Times Square!

These were snapped a couple days back in NYC.

Marissa Miller turns 30 on August 6th, so she’s doing just fine in the “aging well” department. Just look at those damn legs!! Holy God.

And, as most of you know, 2008 is kicking ass for Marissa…

The swell in publicity resulting from her 2008 work served to land Marisa in the number one spot on Maxim magazine’s “Hot 100″ rankings for 2008,[19] beating out list regulars such as Scarlett Johansson, Jessica Biel, and Eva Longoria-Parker. This marked the first time anyone has debuted on the list in the number one position.[20] In her subsequent cover story for the July issue, Maxim proclaimed her as the “return of the great American supermodel.” She also finished first place in The Best Damn Sports Show Period “Smokin’ Sixteen” competition in 2008,[21] repeating her 2007 win over competitors such as supermodels Gisele Bundchen and Adriana Lima. Also in 2008, Marisa ranked #9 in the Askmen.com’s “Top 99″, an increase of three places from the previous year, which was a two-place increase itself from 2006. [Wiki]

View All Photos ›

69 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
jkd
jkd

Marissa is at tops 5'6.5. Google Marissa Miller height. Everyone that has met her say;'s shes between 5'5 and 5'6. She pulls of the the illusion of being tall because she is so thin.

vanos28
vanos28

if kate is 5'5'' and they listing her 5'7,5'' thats 2,5 inches and not 1. so its not a rule that they add just 1 inch.... they same with selita, she is 5'6'' and they list her 5'8''. it looks more likely to add 2 inches. But i do believe that the most important is if you standout and if you are expressive, height really comes second(its good to have but its not everything). The women that are very famous are because of their personality and their unique looks, not because of their height.

well if you disagree then explain me why laetitia casta, marilyn monroe, brigitte bardot, selita, marisa, kate moss, twiggy and others... did a very good career in showbizz?

when they say minimum catwalk height 5'8'' they are talking about the girls that they are the just the hangers... (yeah you prefer the tall hangers than the short) but nobody know or will ever know their names. To make a houseold name you need stong presense and alluring!

UnceB.
UnceB.

she is lovely, juicy and ofcourse sexy!

...
...

hey girls, its easier... we all know that models add at least 1 inch to their height, so you have to be 5'6'' so they can list you as 5'7'' or 5'7,5''.

It funny with kate moss, everybody knows she is 5'5'' and IMG keep listing her 5'7,5''... they lie so much!

I have seen sites though listed as minimum height requirement 5'6''.

Sir Percy of Scandia
Sir Percy of Scandia

Dear Mr. President,

As your 2nd term comes to an end could you please do the American people a huge favor before you leave office. Would you name Marisa Miller's legs as a national treasure. sexiest legs around, even if some say they're short. whatever!

art
art

5'8'' - 5'8,5'' its fine-really good, i also like 5'9'' and 5'10'' more than that not really, as you said they are tall tall. most men are 5'11'' - 6'. if a woman is 5'11' she cant really wear high hills, she is going to be taller than her man which for me is not nice. some men also say that is not comfortable in bed with very tall women...

I believe for selita that she is pretty and has very nice,sexy legs. They say 5'7'', but think about it - 5'6'' girls when they just wear flip flops they become 5'6,5'', so with proper shoes they are definetly in 5'7'' area and above. also 5'6'' girls (with nice bodys)dont look tiny like 5'4'' and under girls do. selita is a very nice and sexy 5'6'' so i guess thats why she is in. The same with laetitia casta, 5'6'' or 5'6,5'', on her prime she was amazing, adorable (and little i say). About kate moss, yeah, you are right. but its not only that, she was lucky because she was the exact face that calvin klein was looking for.

Goliano
Goliano

Kudos for wearin' a lined skirt. Women's legs look extra sexy when you get a peek of the satin.

rare
rare

she wont change her hair color, because VS must fill their blond quota..

rare
rare

" I'd be pleasantly surprised to find somebody like her checking me out. But in the context of "omg supermodels!!11!", she's not all that impressive."

totally correct, but i think that in category "omg supermodels!!11!" there are lot of girls that are overrated..

when it comes to marisa: her face isnt as good as her body

but i must admit , that her body is very close to perfection (i prefer smaller and tighter breasts + she could be little shorter like 5`6, but as we all know: model lie about their heights, so i guess that she actually could be 5`6-5`7 )

Agent_Whoreshit
Agent_Whoreshit

Her Body is damn damn damn damn Hot!!!!!hotter than ever my dearest lima and ms bunchen.i should admit. but i never like her face.. ever..

Aisha
Aisha

She looks perfect here. Her skin is slightly dodgy, but she's still one of the hottest women around at the minute. What a body!

Deborah
Deborah

Her skin looks flawless to me...

anonn1
anonn1

damn i wish i was blessed with a long torso instead of v.long legs. im serious. that is what this girl has and they can always, always look heaps skinnier than us long legged girls because all the stuff in the middle stretches out. I was given the k.k body. short torso, long legs, wide hips. everyone goes on about my legs but i'd much rather have been born with a long torso they look so much better, also i would be able to squeeze my hip bones into size 2 jeans which I cannot ever do because my hip bones are too wide. shame.

d55
d55

I am about 5'8'' and dont consider myself tall, either unless I am in heels but people say I am tall and "so tall" in heels....when I see someone else around the same height, I consider them tall, though...5'7'' is borderline tall...when you're 5'10" or more, you look tall tall...Kate Moss is an exception to the modelling world as she became big when she was already young so her height didnt really do any harm to her (she lies about it and claims to be 5'7'', though)...but I agree about Selita...I dont know how they let her be a VS model...I guess it's her face or something or VS just needed a replacement for Tyra Banks right away

art
art

well i am a girl, i am almost 5'7'' and i dont consider myself tall. neither my best girlfriend that she is 5'7,5''.

Anyway, they say minimum height 5'7'' for models but for example selita is 5'6'' (evey person that have seen her states at the internet that she is 5'6'') and kate moss... even shorter...

thats why i said height is not a matter.. the most important is the proporions and the type that a model has. (well, ok, not to be under 5'5''-5'4'' i guess....)

d55
d55

5'7'' is pretty tall for a woman, especially if she is thin and has a nice figure...it's the min requirement in the modelling word...whatever height you see or hear about a model, it is usually one inch less unless she is already tall like 5'11'' or taller...in that case, they either downgrade it or keep it as is

biteme
biteme

Her face actually looks so much better than normal. Wow. I am now a Marissa Miller fan.

d_jologs
d_jologs

I don't like her face but her body is rockin'!

junglegirl
junglegirl

30 going on 50. My grandma has younger looking skin than this troll.

art
art

only 5'7''? hmmm, yeah it is possible. then i guess we come to the conclusion that height is not a matter

d55
d55

hot chick...not looking her best here though...that lipstick color is ugly and matte.

vanos28
vanos28

wrong place for my comment...

vanos28
vanos28

is pstroyer a he? i thought it was a she... anyway you wont convince me by saying that pstroyer would agree with you... i need a stronger argument.... by the way 'if 10.000 say a foolish thing, is still a foolish thing'

anyway, in those pics the camera targeting on her face...

if you think she has short legs, thats fine, i dont agree, but i am not going to argue for ever like some others do... besides its marissa's legs not mine

d55
d55

damn...I butchered it haha...here is what I meant:

"That's not true...for your bust to be 34", your ribcage has to be about 29-29.5...as you only add 5 to the number of your band measurement to get your band size (even 30" ribcage might be 34 as you round the # up or down to the nearest even numbered cup size (34 or 36)).

Cup size is when you subtract the number you get after you add 5 from the number you get when you measure your breasts at their fullest...so if she is a D cup, the difference between her band size (after you add 5) and actual breast size is about 3 1/2 to 4 1/2 inches...and she isnt 5'8'' but 5'7'' "

d55
d55

That's not true...for a bust to be 34", your ribcage has to be about 29-29.5" as you only add 5 to the number of your band measurement to get your band size...cup size is when you subtract the number you just got from the number you get when you measure your breasts at their fullest...so if she is a D cup, the difference between her band size (after you add 5) and breast size is about 3 1/2 to 4 1/2 inches...and she isnt 5'8'' but 5'7''

vanos28
vanos28

is pstroyer a he? i thought it was a she... anyway you wont convince me by saying that pstroyer would agree with you... i need a stronger argument.... by the way 'if 10.000 say a foolish thing, is still a foolish thing'

anyway, in those pics the camera targeting on her face...

if you think she has short legs, thats fine, i dont agree, but i am not going to argue for ever like some others do... besides its marissa's legs not mine

Auntie Krist
Auntie Krist

This woman is magnanimously HOT and beautiful in person. Tall as a goddess. Those freaking legs are sooooo long. I'd love to keep her for the weekend.

Hallery
Hallery

I would love to see her as a brunette (her natural color) or even a redhead. It think she would pull both off very well.

Blickerfield93277
Blickerfield93277

damn! super hot! damn!! i called "crazy hot" still... but still, i am chicago cubs fan... not the new york mets, cause they suck ass

concubine
concubine

she looks like a whore in the headlights

Hallery
Hallery

Her body is perfect, I mean perfect. I think her skin is looking a lot better here. She is a really good surfer (placed second in the Kelly Slater celeb invitational) and she's just got sun damage. That's a lot of why her body is so hot too though so it's a trade off. I have seen 19 y/o guys who for real look 45 because they spend all day, every day, in the ocean. Her skin is actually doing very well for someone who has spent her whole life in the sun.

AlinaMaria
AlinaMaria

lol you make me laugh. Because a person expresses an opinion different to yours you label them gay or jealous? Everyone's perception of beauty is different.

And thats the bottom line.........

Stone Cold
Stone Cold

Ya know....... You jealous bitches and gay freakin men can slice it and dice it anyway you want, but you have to realize there's a reason she was voted #1 and IS the hottest model on the planet. Pick it apart if it makes you feel better, but there ain't a "straight" man out there that wouldn't worship the ground this goddess walks on. I'd be first in line.

And thats the bottom line.........

Lili
Lili

She'd look so much better with brown hair

(Uncertified Bastard)
(Uncertified Bastard)

Well if it is "just the angle" then why are there so many photos from different angles where it STILL looks like she has short legs and a long torso?

Just look at her legs in these photos. They don't look long. And they would look even shorter if she weren't wearing heels. Big heels create the illusion of having long legs.

And her torso is undeniable long. I bet ya anything that Pstroyer would agree with me and he is a perfectionist and knows all about proportions.

Andromeda18_
Andromeda18_

Rufus, according to her website she's 5'8'', 110lbs and her measurements are 34-23-35.

Height is a static measurement so assuming she's telling the truth about her height (models tend to say they're taller than they really are) then she really is 5'8''. As for weight and measurements, those can fluctuate quite a bit but I'd say they seem accurate enough. Except for one thing, her bust measurement. I don't believe her bust is only 34''. I mean, I'm a 34D which means my bust is 38'' around and her breasts are at least as big as mine, I'd say even bigger. For her bust to be 34'' around, her ribcage would be only 25/26'' around which is a really, really small ribcage and you can tell just by looking at her that she doesn't have such a small ribcage. In fact, it says on the wikipedia that she's a 34D which makes a lot more sense.

vanos28
vanos28

are u kiding? her body looks perfect! is just the position of the camera, above her torso and gives the impression that the legs are short. (if you dont believe - try it home)

AlinaMaria
AlinaMaria

i noticed that. He doesnt have to be gay to notice footwear. Most men on here comment on a womans feet before anything else! Apart form being last season, the shoes are gross. They look like trotters or something.

lmao...
lmao...

...those shoes are last seasons? wtf? are you a fag or something?? what straight man really notices shit like that?? most WOMEN wouldnt even notice that.

and who the fuck cares if somehting is "last season" if it looks good? are you supposed to throw away your beautiful and expensive shoes just because some fashion idiot said they are "so last season" and the trends are changing?

jamieson
jamieson

her skin looks better here than it normally does. i like her hair and she has eyes are beautiful,

however i think those shoes are last seasons - everyone else was rocking those kicks around 3/4 months ago. unless these are old pix

Andromeda18_
Andromeda18_

According to her website she's 5'8'', 110lbs and her measurements are 34-23-35.

Height is a static measurement so assuming she's telling the truth about her height (models tend to say they're taller than they really are) then she really is 5'8''. As for weight and measurements, those can fluctuate quite a bit but I'd say they seem accurate enough. Except for one thing, her bust measurement. I don't believe her bust is only 34''. I mean, I'm a 34D which means my bust is 38'' around and her breasts are at least as big as mine, I'd say even bigger. For her bust to be 34'' around, her ribcage would be only 25/26'' around which is a really, really small ribcage and you can tell just by looking at her that she doesn't have such a small ribcage. In fact, it says on the wikipedia that she's a 34D which makes a lot more sense.

wut?
wut?

Look at her eyes. One is looking at me, the other is looking at my twin three feet to my right. There isn't one picture of her above where both of her eyes are focused on the same thing. It's not blatantly obvious, but she's slightly wall-eyed.

And come on, she's 29. You shouldn't look like that at 29 unless you've spent YEARS in the sun (which is probably why she looks old for her age).

As to Ed Yang's comment below, sure, I agree. If she was working at Wal-Mart when I went in to pick up my family size bag of Tater Tots and Mayonnaise, I'd be pleasantly surprised to find somebody like her checking me out. But in the context of "omg supermodels!!11!", she's not all that impressive. That's not to say I wouldn't follow her around just for the chance to smell her farts if she asked me to, but looking at the bigger picture is important here.

Flake
Flake

Not aging good. Why do most supermodels go down the hill quickly?

Bad skin but nice eye colour.

Flake
Flake

I love her I'm constipated and tying to take a dump whilst standing pose.

Also love the different poses here.

Face is busted like Jessica simpson/desperate Dan and body is nothing special. She looks shapeless at times.

Nice leg though. Not the weird one.

Yvonne
Yvonne

Wow, you're totally right. I thought her body was hot but her face was fucking ugly. But then I pictured her to be either my dentist or my dentist's assistant and she's soo much hotter than that balding 45-year old guy or that overweight, probably even older, saggy, bored-looking hag.