Sandy Brook Elementary Shooter Adam Lanza Brings The Links!

Screen Shot 2012-12-14 at 5.32.58 PM
Obviously, we’re still waiting for the leaked photo! More importantly, how many more people need to die before they change the gun laws in our great nation?! Latest shooting included 28 people, of which 20 were children. R.I.P. I can’t imagine what the parents are going through right now…

– Sara Jean Underwood Sexiness For Draftday [HollywoodTuna]
– Amanda Bynes Apparently Wants You To See What Dieting Did To Her Boob [The Superficial]
– When is Mimi Aspen time? [Lainey’s Gossip]
– Gwyneth Paltrow can ‘eat most men under a table,’ tries to do so in video clip: gross? [Celebitchy]
Lindsay Lohan’s Storage Unit Is Being Auctioned Off [IDonLikeYouInThatWay]
– GOOPY Eats Most Men Under The Table [Dlisted]
– Jessica Alba Gets Leggy In Shiny Leggings [Popoholic]
– JULIANNE HOUGH IS MEAN AND ANGRY CUZ SHE’S CHUNKY IN A BIKINI OF THE DAY [Drunken Stepfather, NSFW]
– “JAY-Z’S SISTER” WILL GET ALL UP IN YOUR NEWSCAST [MassAppeal]

– Marilyn Manson’s Ear Almost Slashed Off [The Blemish]
– The New PSY [Viralosity.tv]
– Let’s All Love Amanda Seyfried Now [Evil Beet]
– Naya Rivera Shows Off Her Hot Christmas Outfit [Complex]
– JENNIFER GARNER TAKES SERAPHINA TO BREAKFAST [I’m Not Obsessed]
– Nick Cannon didn’t have sex with Mariah Carey until they were married [Celebslam]

– BAR REFAELI EXPLOITS CHRISTMAS FOR FINANCIAL GAIN OF THE DAY [Drunken Stepfather, NSFW]
– Amanda Seyfried Threw Anne Hathaway’s Vagina Under The Bus [The Superficial]
– Five Ways Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings are Better than Each Other
[Pajiba]
– Emma Watson Sex Picture [Celeb Jihad]
– This Is Why Social Media Is Awful During a National Tragedy [BroBible]

– TGIF’s Romance Hall of Fame [Lainey’s Gossip]
– Claudia Galanti Is Working On Her Fitness [HollywoodTuna]

– Justin Bieber Murder/Castration Plot Foiled by Police [Yeeeah!]
– Hugh Grant Is A Throbbing Asshole, So Says Jon Stewart [Dlisted]

– Are you a Bastardly Lady of the Day? [The Bastardly]

79 comments
MoeJackson
MoeJackson moderator

This entire story gets creepier & creepier. 

MoeJackson
MoeJackson

This entire story gets creepier & creepier.

jimbo 77
jimbo 77

Its things like this happening that makes me think it would be for the best if 2012 is the year that the world ends, we are a horrible race and don't deserve the planet we live on!

jimbo 77
jimbo 77

Its things like this happening that makes me think it would be for the best if 2012 is the year that the world ends, we are a horrible race and don't deserve the planet we live on!

FabianoCruz
FabianoCruz

Restrict access to guns and shit like that will happen less often. It's that simple.

FabianoCruz
FabianoCruz

Restrict access to guns and shit like that will happen less often. It's that simple.

McP
McP

China and Japan have recently had massacres of children using knives.  So why the focus on guns?  More than anything, I think it's an issue with society and humans in general, we suppress and ridicule empathy.  And secondly, the way we handle mental health issues (which is to not provide free treatment for those who cannot afford it, and for those who can, just pump them full of pharmaceuticals).Incidentally, one of the main reasons I refused to vote for Obama was his killing of innocent children with drones -- 200 in Pakistan alone.  Two national candidates opposed it, they didn't even get 2% of the vote combined.  We only pretend to detest violence.  We support it and embrace it in so many ways. 

McP
McP

China and Japan have recently had massacres of children using knives.  So why the focus on guns?  More than anything, I think it's an issue with society and humans in general, we suppress and ridicule empathy.  And secondly, the way we handle mental health issues (which is to not provide free treatment for those who cannot afford it, and for those who can, just pump them full of pharmaceuticals).Incidentally, one of the main reasons I refused to vote for Obama was his killing of innocent children with drones -- 200 in Pakistan alone.  Two national candidates opposed it, they didn't even get 2% of the vote combined.  We only pretend to detest violence.  We support it and embrace it in so many ways.

GrgeCdnBastard
GrgeCdnBastard

Why would an elementary school teacher who has a troubled son need to own four guns?

GrgeCdnBastard
GrgeCdnBastard

Why would an elementary school teacher who has a troubled son need to own four guns?

Bozz
Bozz

How come people look at children in the face and then shoot them. This is very very sad.

Bozz
Bozz

How come people look at children in the face and then shoot them. This is very very sad.

Planet Nebo
Planet Nebo

A child's life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness trumps the 2nd amendment.

Planet Nebo
Planet Nebo

A kindergarter's life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness trumps the 2nd amendment.

skilligan
skilligan

The world is a very dangerous place, nobody is safe anywhere

WeeItsNookies
WeeItsNookies

@FabianoCruz No it wouldn't. Look at history, people killed people long before guns. Laws affect thepeople who live by the rules of society already. The people who don't live by those rules are called criminals,whether they have a gun or not. It is a naive belief that gun control, controls criminals. We have too many guns and too many armed civilians. We have always had an easy access to guns and there has always been a fuck ton of guns. But yet mass public shootings is a recent occurance. SOMETHING has changed, and it has nothing to do with the guns. Could it be the media sensationalizing and glamoring the shooters? Making them famous? Did this guy go into the school with the thought of "Yup, ima one up that VT guy and shoot a bunch of children, I'll be famous"? Unless you take away every single reason why someone would want to kill, people will find a way to do it with or without a gun. Give me $30.00 bucks and I'll go to homedepot and get everything needed to make a bomb, a bomb that will do more destruction than an inexperienced shooter with adrenaline pumping to the point he can't think straight. A simple bomb to make is a pipebomb. Grab a PVC pipe, go to the firework store and get FUCK TONS of sparklers, crush the sparklers up into a power, get ball bearings (metal balls) fill up the PVC pipe, screw on end caps and tada you have a deadly pipebomb that will kill more people than some idiot with a gun. Trust me, you don't want to ban guns then have people resorting to making BOMBS. People become too irrational when they get emotional. Of course you're having every brain dead bandwagon hopping idiot going "ZOMG BAN GUNS" being completely oblivious to the numbers. There's 305 million people in this nation. An estimated 250-300 million guns. Almost half the population owns a gun. Over the course of 25 years we have had 7 mass public shootings that made national media attention. Consisting of 9 men total. So in 25 years, with the amount of guns we have this has happened shy of a dozen times. 9 people out of the 90+ MILLION gun owners have used their guns to do harm. Literally like .00001% of the gun owner population has went on a shooting spree, but yet we should take guns away from the millions upon millions of law abiding citizens just because the actions of a few? Give me a break. That is simply being irrational.There's always knives, crossbows(which could possibly kill even more people, Look at how badass the Green Arrow is duh), bombs, cars,etc. With the amount of people, armed people and guns we have, we only have on average 10,000 deaths per year as a result of gun crime. THE MAJORITY of that is gang violence related. People living in inner cities (ghettos) account for the MAJORITY of our overall crime statistics. Being poverty stricken = Bad education. Poor education + Poverty = Crime. So realistically we're looking at maybe half of that. Deaths on ILLEGAL drug overdoses surpass that. Deaths from getting hit by a DUI rivals that. Doctors kill 5,000 people a year due to accidents. A child is 12 times more likely to die by a car than he is a gun. The people who are against guns basically just show they lack the very basic concept of math. That one number is small, one number is big.

WeeItsNookies
WeeItsNookies

FabianoCruz No it wouldn't. Look at history, people killed people long before guns. Laws affect thepeople who live by the rules of society already. The people who don't live by those rules are called criminals,whether they have a gun or not. It is a naive belief that gun control, controls criminals. We have too many guns and too many armed civilians. We have always had an easy access to guns and there has always been a fuck ton of guns. But yet mass public shootings is a recent occurance. SOMETHING has changed, and it has nothing to do with the guns. Could it be the media sensationalizing and glamoring the shooters? Making them famous? Did this guy go into the school with the thought of "Yup, ima one up that VT guy and shoot a bunch of children, I'll be famous"? Unless you take away every single reason why someone would want to kill, people will find a way to do it with or without a gun. Give me $30.00 bucks and I'll go to homedepot and get everything needed to make a bomb, a bomb that will do more destruction than an inexperienced shooter with adrenaline pumping to the point he can't think straight. A simple bomb to make is a pipebomb. Grab a PVC pipe, go to the firework store and get FUCK TONS of sparklers, crush the sparklers up into a power, get ball bearings (metal balls) fill up the PVC pipe, screw on end caps and tada you have a deadly pipebomb that will kill more people than some idiot with a gun. People become too irrational when they get emotional. Of course you're having every brain dead bandwagon hopping idiot going "ZOMG BAN GUNS" being completely oblivious to the numbers. There's 305 million people in this nation. An estimated 250-300 million guns. Almost half the population owns a gun. Over the course of 25 years we have had 7 mass public shootings that made national media attention. Consisting of 9 men total. So in 25 years, with the amount of guns we have this has happened shy of a dozen times. 9 people out of the 90+ MILLION gun owners have used their guns to do harm. Literally like .00001% of the gun owner population has went on a shooting spree, but yet we should take guns away from the millions upon millions of law abiding citizens just because the actions of a few? Give me a break. That is simply being irrational.There's always knives, crossbows(which could possibly kill even more people, Look at how badass the Green Arrow is duh), bombs, cars,etc. With the amount of people, armed people and guns we have..We only have on average 10,000 deaths per year as a result of gun crime. THE MAJORITY of that is gang violence related. People living in inner cities (ghettos) account for the MAJORITY of our overall crime statistics. Being poverty stricken = Bad education. Poor education + Poverty = Crime. So realistically we're looking at maybe half of that. Deaths on ILLEGAL drug overdoses surpass that. Deaths from getting hit by a DUI rivals that. Doctors kill 5,000 people a year due to accidents. A child is 12 times more likely to die by a car than he is a gun. The people who are against guns basically just show they lack the very basic concept of math. That one number is small, one number is big.

Planet Nebo
Planet Nebo

GrgeCdnBastard Because she needed to protect herself from her own government. Doesn't that sound logical?

MoeJackson
MoeJackson moderator

@Bozz

Fucking makes me sick.

I feel like they need to mandate psychological tests with annual physicals

Bozz
Bozz

also what happen to the guy who shoot people in Batman's movie premiere now?

MoeJackson
MoeJackson

Bozz

Fucking makes me sick.

I feel like they need to mandate psychological tests with annual physicals

Bozz
Bozz

also what happen to the guy who shoot people in Batman's movie premiere now?

TaylorHernandez
TaylorHernandez

@Planet Nebo  maybe if they had school safety there  that carried guns they could of killed this douche before he could kill 20 kids. the guns didn't kill them the person behind them did! with out legal guns there will only be more illegal guns and all the wrong people with them and no one to protect anyone from those people think about it

TaylorHernandez
TaylorHernandez

Planet Nebo  maybe if they had school safety there  that carried guns they could of killed this douche before he could kill 20 kids. the guns didn't kill them the person behind them did! with out legal guns there will only be more illegal guns and all the wrong people with them and no one to protect anyone from those people think about it

McP
McP

WeeItsNookies Holy crap dude use the Return key.

Planet Nebo
Planet Nebo

@TaylorHernandez @Planet Nebo It's sad that we live in a society where school children need to be protected by armed guards while they are in school. Maybe I'm a dreamer, but I would like to live in a society where there were no guns. These types of mass murders with guns have become more common and something has to be done.

Planet Nebo
Planet Nebo

TaylorHernandez Planet Nebo It's sad that we live in a society where school children need to be protected by armed guards while they are in school. Maybe I'm a dreamer, but I would like to live in a society where there were no guns. These types of mass murders with guns have become more common and something has to be done.

Planet Nebo
Planet Nebo

TaylorHernandez Planet Nebo It's sad that we live in a society where school children need to be protected by armed guards while they are in school. Maybe I'm a dreamer, but I would like to live in a society where there were no guns. These types of mass murders with guns have become more common and something has to be done.

Gabbo
Gabbo

@MoeJackson @WeeItsNookies @McP I might know partly what is happening. I usually hit shift+enter to BR the lines. However, it doesn't line return like it should. It forces me to use enter to start a new paragraph.

MoeJackson
MoeJackson moderator

@WeeItsNookies @McP  

Why can other people have paragraphs in their comments but not you?! That's what I don't get...

Did you try editing?

WeeItsNookies
WeeItsNookies

@McP @WeeItsNookies I did, this site blows. I actually had that in 5 paragraphs but whenever posting it put it into one giant paragraph. Funny that moe liked your comment when he is at fault for it to begin with. :P

MoeJackson
MoeJackson

Gabbo  

True! I miss the lil' booger!

Gabbo
Gabbo

GrgeCdnBastard Bozz Who else but Glim is going to go through my whole pictures pile and make comments?

GrgeCdnBastard
GrgeCdnBastard

Bozz GrgeCdnBastard I think he ran off with Caitie. I sensed a bond between them everytime Glim made a long post.

Bozz
Bozz

GrgeCdnBastard WHERE IS GLIMMER NOW?!

Gabbo
Gabbo

MoeJackson WeeItsNookies McP I might know partly what is happening. I usually hit shift+enter to BR the lines. However, it doesn't line return like it should. It forces me to use enter to start a new paragraph.

Gabbo
Gabbo

MoeJackson WeeItsNookies McP I might know partly what is happening. I usually hit shift+enter to BR the lines. However, it doesn't line return like it should. It forces me to use enter to start a new paragraph.

MoeJackson
MoeJackson

WeeItsNookies McP  

Why can other people have paragraphs in their comments but not you?! That's what I don't get...

Did you try editing?

McP
McP

WeeItsNookies McP

 LMAO

WeeItsNookies
WeeItsNookies

McP WeeItsNookies I did, this site blows. I actually had that in 5 paragraphs but whenever posting it put it into one giant paragraph. Funny that moe liked your comment when he is at fault for it to begin with. :P