Kim Kardashian Dies Online For AIDS Charity, Keep a Child Alive

p.s. i used some psychological terms so because you have shits for brains, i will make it easier for you understand what i was trying to say by breaking it down for you once more:

"implicational belief about self" - pretty much the self-image that the person has of himself/herself that he/she will resist to change and will hold onto as tight as possible under any circumstance, even in the face of contradictory evidence.

"psychological defense mechanism" - (normally, i don't link wikipedia as it is a political and historical propaganda tool but in this case, it comes in handy and is pretty good at explaining it) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_mechanism

soooo assgoo, i shall log out now and go out to have some fun. I win; you lose :D catch me on another thread if i can't be back, my lil bitch

"Talking to you is worthless. Reading your responses is worthless. And attempting to have a discussion with you is worthless."

You started shit with me in the first place, thinking you could take me on; you read ALL my replies - even the ones you claim you never bothered to read; you took the time to write this reply (notice your mad tone; you're angry you have no reply) yet you keep avoiding replying to my posts where i OWN you. LOL silly lil bitch...stop trying to save face. If owned, the right thing to do would be to say, "you're right". That does not mean defeat; it just means you're capable of comprehending shit and just never thought of things that way, and most importantly, it makes you credible but see, because you have the implicational belief that you're an intelligent person, in the evidence of contradictory evidence, you do anything you can to hold onto that implicational belief so in your head, "i never replied because i never read your post" defense allows you to convince yourself that you were never OWNED. It's a psychological defense mechanism, assgoo.

Stop writing BS replies that have no substance, assgoo. The other time, you said you were not going to reply because my reply was too long yet you wrote a bunch of other replies that had nothing to do with my reply just to save face. All you did was change the direction of the argument. Now, you're doing the same shit. OWNED, assgoo, OWNED sooo bad. Those little "comment rocks" really got to your empty head that you actually thought you had something going on. You're stupid, assgoo. You truly are. As i said earlier, you're hopeless.

Bahahahahahahahahahahah TWICE IN A FUCKING ROW!!!! Why is it that whenever i fucking own your ass to the point that you have nothing to say, you claim to have not bothered to read my replies, huh? You have shits for brains, assgoo. Mcperv's reply to that specific post pretty much said what i said in my reply. I just got more technical and detailed since your shits for brains cannot comprehend shit so i tried breaking it down for you.

Assgoo, you're a fucking retard, and you cannot and will never be able to keep up with me. It 's impossible because i am superior to you. OWNED AGAIN, MY LITTLE DUMB BITCH :)

DAMMNIIIIT I MISSED MY OPPORTUNITY TO BE IN THE MIDDLE OF LONG CHAIN D55 ARGUMENT THREAD PARAPHENELIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! uggghh, but it's so hot,s exy, and laugh worthy to read, ^_^_^_^_^_^_^__^!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn why cant i stay away from that drama!!!!!!!

Yep, and the biggest difference between humans and animals is that we consciously choose to do evil things whereas animals don't, they're just trying to survive.

If she really did die (not that I want her to... I don't wish death on anyone really) do you think she would ever decompose due to all the plastic that makes up her body? Seems she isn't very green or humanitarian-like after all....

wow. this thread.

^^^The post 3 up, by D55 is a classic example of a ranting diatribe, ladies and gentlemen, based purely on a self imposed delusion of morale superiority, enjoy.

The way we as a race currently handle ourselves, I would say The Alliance.

Although I would like to hope that we can hit the disporia from earth in a more Heinlein like fashion.

Btw, asgoo? What are you, five? Do you even notice how much of a dweeb you sound like?

Agreed. We've pretty much eliminated a lot of our environmental pressures. Our population is getting too large, thus all the problems.

Bitch, please.

Once again, I don't fucking care about you or your damn opinions. I read the first 4 words of your comment and that was enough.

McPerv is actually capable of coming up with reasonable arguments in a reasonable manner. Notice that because of that (being a reasonably intelligent and respectable human being with some common sense), he will actually get the attention that you so desperately seek by hollering and screaming at people. Sorry, you're worthless. Talking to you is worthless. Reading your responses is worthless. And attempting to have a discussion with you is worthless. Go away.

pretty asinine, eh?

ahhhhh assgoo is here again, thinking he is so intelligent, trying to get into arguments like this. Upon initially reading what you wrote, it sounds like a reasonable and valid argument but it is an argument only simple minded morons can agree on, and here is why:

First of all, you CANNOT base an argument, a belief, a decision on what could/would/might have happened. Saying if animals were gifted with human intelligence, they would have done the same damage we're doing is, simply put, a DUMB argument. Based on your logic, let me create a scenario:

You're given the option to choose between two women. Out of those 2 women, one is a blind woman, who is missing a leg or two, in addition to being, physically speaking, ugly; the other one is your imaginary girlfriend candice. Are you going to choose the other chick over candice by sitting back and rationalizing shit by saying, "well, if she had genetically gifted parents, if she were not born blind with legs and arms missing,"......

No, you're going to choose candice. She is hot and enabled; it is what it is. She was born that way; she did not choose to have the physically attractive traits she has just like the other woman did not choose to be born unattractive and disabled.

Second of all,

"Murder, rape...common activities in the animal kingdom."

is again a dumb argument to justify what human beings are doing to animals. If this is your argument, then again by your logic, rape and murder committed by human-beings SHOULD BE LEGAL AND GO UNPUNISHED LIKE IT IS IN ANIMAL KINGDOM. How come they are not then? Because we have advance intelligence; as a result, we function differently than animals. Those activities committed by animals are INSTINCTS, and you cannot punish an animal for acting on its instincts just like you cannot punish a 4 year old human-being for not knowing any better. Animals function on reflexive mode, while human beings function on both reflexive mode and reflective mode. It is how human-brain is programmed so the human-being has the capability to stop and think about whether what he/she is about to do is right or wrong, and that is why rape and murder among human-beings is NOT legal.

"Unprovoked aggression for no other reason than to prove one's self worth and take over other animals' territory?"

Animals do NOT have unprovoked aggression; it is an instinct. The only time animals show what you might call "unprovoked aggression" is when they want to mate. They compete with other males, and again, it is an instinct, a very necessary instinct so the animal species can keep on reproducing.

Basically, you can't use "animals do it, too" argument to support your belief because it fails in many aspects, animals being programmed differently than us being the main one so your entire argument is null, assgoo. Thanks for providing me with another lovely opportunity prove my superiority over you, and yes, once again, you have been OWNED.

(shout out to my other fans but my internet won't load the page because of all the comments...just had to OWN assgoo again that i spent 10 mins trying to post this one reply alone...catch me on other threads)

Which one genuinely sounds more feasable: Starfleet or The Alliance?

I personally think this is part of the "problem" with the human race. We no longer have enough darwism in our lives. We no longer really have "final frontiers" with which to cull the herd on. I guess we can only wait till we start to colonize the stars to start getting rid of the dna dead weight.

*cocks a shotgun*

Cool.

Let's go to Miami. I've always wanted to hunt the elusive Cuntus Whorus.

"people don't want to be educated or enlightened -- too inconvenient to them. Your average, typical person is just an asshole. "

I can't believe you don't see it. That IS instinctual. To pass the work onto others, to try to get as much as you can for yourself...these are instincs that were gifted to us by our ancestors. Why? Because it makes it more likely we'll survive. Does enlightenment actually increase a person's survival or chance of bearing offspring? Not really. Most of the time it has the opposite effect. So why would you expect our species as a whole to spend effort into something with none of the evolutionary benefits? The only benefits you get vary from person to person which would explain why only a few people strive to become enlightened. I agree with you that it kind of sucks, and I would love for people to strive towards being their best possible, but hey, let's be reasonable and let's understand why that ain't gonna happen.

Animals are the same. Why aren't animals improving themselves? Why do most animals try to steal others' kills by aggression rather than go out and hunt themselves? Why aren't they trying to become enlightened on how to use tools, etc?

Why? Because they're perfect in their own right? No, because it's inconvenient.

Everything you are describing is an ANIMAL thing (including humans), not a human thing.

And as Catie said, you criticize the things about humans that come from their more complex brain function without listing the positives.

Such as, humans are capable of fidelity, and respect. Two things you will rarely see in the animal kingdom except for a few other Humans are capable of conscious sacrifice. You will only see that in the animal kingdom on a techniaclity...mothers whose hormones tell them to be aggressive when they have offspring, and then they wind up being killed (although most will just let the predator kill the offspring).

Look, I'm not trying to argue with you here or anything. But, I've studied a lot of evolutionary psychology. Everything humans do on a large level, is a form of instinct, that is not different than animals', just built upon. Everything. From how we percieve, how we process information, how we navigate, how we cheat (which btw apes and humans share only because they are capable of theory of mind...thinking about what another is thinking...if other animals were capable of theory of mind, they would decieve in a heartbeat because it is a good survival tactic). All of it is stuff other animals have that through natural selection, we have built upon.

Actually Beavers can cause mass destruction and have on occasion, when there is an absence of predators.

SO I propose that we allow legal hunts of our fellow humans, to cull the herd.

"No other animal does that."

Yes but you're missing the point. The reason they don't is because they don't have the intelligence to create a massive volume of waste, not because they're so thoughtful compared to us.

Do you honestly think people create waste and ruin our Earth for no other reason than to be some kind of Austin Powers-type villain? No, it's out of selfishness. They want resources as easily as possible and don't care about the negative effects of them getting it. Animals are just as selfish, and if they were as high in population as humans and were aware of things like plastic or cars that run on gas, they would have made them. Our act of wasting...IS an instinctual act. Just on a massive, more organized, more technical scale. Because humans are more organized, more technical.

Dolphins cannot perform malice? That must be a comment formed from watching too many Discovery Channel segments. Dolphins do commit organized murder. And so would other animals if they were capable of planning, but most animals aren't. However, most animals engage in ritual slaughtering of each other for presumed "threats" on one's leadership. Our malice stems from earlier animal malice. It is just more complicated now, because humans are more complicated.

And honestly, the whole Earth being destroyed thing...what a huge example of humankind's egocentrism. The Earth is a lot more durable than we think it is. We can "destroy it" but in reality, we'd be temporarily messing it up, which will cause our species to be wiped out and the Earth would eventually go back to the way it was. Everything is in equilibrium. You push the equilibrium one way it will eventually push back.

well, I can live without Kim's twitter... along with the other celebs...

this cause is basically very stupid and ridiculous. It seems that they are threatening the fans that they must doneate if they still want to Retweet or reply to their idols' tweets. lol.

Then maybe you should smash your computer & go live in the woods, like The Unabomber.

I really feel sorry for you. I do. I'm sorry that you can't see the good in people and that you choose to focus on the negative aspects. I've had fucked up shit happen to me and I still choose to see the good in people.

Then again, I'm an EDUCATOR.

So wait... the theory behind this is that everyone out there cannot live without Kim K's twitter page so they will donate money JUST to get her back online??? This is so so very sad in several ways. They are saying no one will donate money to the AIDS fund purely to help out with the cause. However, they WILL donate money to get Kim's Twitter page back up. That is insanity!!!!! The WORST of it is that it may actually be true. Eff... I feel so sorry for the world right now... : (

Kim, why not donate some money yourself??? Or some time??? Instead you are pretending not to log into your facebook and twitter. This is so dumb! All for publicity in the end.

hahahahaha !

Nope, not malice there, just instinct and something done for survival.

Re. humans, I've been an activist for 20 years, people don't want to be educated or enlightened -- too inconvenient to them. Your average, typical person is just an asshole. Humans are capable of good things, but the default position is to be narcissistic and apathetic. What positive traits? A small minority capable of empathy and selflessness? I'm underwhelmed.

The #1 concern for people who care about *other people* ought to be the environment, not just a little concern but the overriding, panicked priority. But people just want to satisfy themselves and keep pooping out babies and leaving a shithole for future generations.

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSValAsLOEUWcVcoEZkNktV6rJbn_hUFhu7EJKIF1sPdW_cU4KUzw

So...when an animal culls the weakest of its offspring, that isn't malice? That's just...nature being nature? Survival of the fittest, right? Because, that sounds an awful lot like malice to me.

And also, are you aware that you exhibit more negative traits that humans have than positive when you go on these rants? Especially when talk about how humanity needs to die. Instead of saying that you could educate people and enlighten them, you're just saying fuck it, let's kill 'em all...worthless mammals.

I'm seeing two sides of an argument, but only one side that's actually admitting it...and it's not you. I thought you'd be more mature and capable of seeing both sides of an argument. I guess not.

Stupid. The earth has been around for billions of years and we are destroying it in a small sliver of time. No other animal does that.

You cannot compare an instinctual act that produces waste or suffering to a deliberate one (or an apathetic one).

Animals (maybe chimps excepted) cannot form malice. Dolphins surely have the capacity to form malice, but do not appear to do it; so it's not a given that other animals, if more "intelligent," would be assholes like us. Not to mention the argument is retarded -- you are arguing that if animals were different from what they are they might be assholes. What does that matter?

WOOT!!1!

ONE HUNDRED SEPTILLION DOLLARS!

$1 million dollars to keep death online?

how much do we need so she can really die IRL?

second that!!!!

I has sad.. I love Leslie Neilsen... I just fucking love him, this is so sad.....

FUCKING BRILLIANT!

I imagined it...and then I went gay...and then I realized that would only ENHANCE the sex...so now I'm asexual.

everybody, for clarifications sake, i too removed my own picture from my profile because i am an ugly fuck and a loser like these guys that ended up removing my picture after d55's replies to me.

just wanted to give the beast full credit

imagine, IMAGINE the hate sex........oh fuck, i just imagined it

.....i ralphed on my lap

You do realize that all those things apply to animals as well? Waste? Look at bears in the north during salmon season and how they'll kill up to 200 salmon a day only to take one bite out of each one. Murder, rape...common activities in the animal kingdom. Selfishness? There is no alternative. Cheating? All the time. Deceit? Unprovoked aggression for no other reason than to prove one's self worth and take over other animals' territory? That's a little similar to a thing we call war.

Really, the only thing that stops animals from committing the cruelties of humans is a lack of brain function to organize such things. But I can guarantee that if you gave any animal more brain volume, they would be the same as us. Humans are animals; to say animals are better than humans is as wrong as saying humans are better than animals.

Oh, god yeah.

Yeah, people suck. But people are capable of amazing things. My daughter's womb (I refuse to call her biological mom...her mother...because I'm her mother) is a total junkie bitch...but she made Simone. And I'm grateful to her for that face.

Why did Leslie had to day and this bitch still be alive!? live is not fair

Oh most definitely, and I still don't think we're any less deserving of life, but it doesn't hurt to point out our shortcomings, of which there are many.

But we're also capable of doing amazing things. And love.

I think that outweighs any negatives.

Yup, that just about sums us up.

I think I love you.

LOL, I hate hippies, too many of them in the animal rights movement. Yes, less deserving of life. We are fucking WRECKING the planet aren't we? Place won't even be habitable in one or two hundred years at best. We have people stoning women for cheating; wars and bombing over religion, greed and apathy toward each other, animals, and the planet; theft; murder; rape; slavery (still). Just overall stupidity, religious fanaticism, intolerance, abject cruelty, and general apathy. People just suck.

Putting her ass up for auction would raise a million bucks, no sweat.

cheap publicity stunt designed to keep her name in the spotlight

Ok, well you certainly implied so with your hippie rantings. We are deffo capable of more despicable acts, but less deserving of life? I'd really like to know why you think that.

Yes, and it can be just as fun seeing her foaming at the mouth over nonsense.

She hates everything on Earth. Literally.

Yeah that sums it up pretty well. ;-)

Well, she also hates celebrities who are pretentious and/or stuck up.