Photo Shoot Matchup: “In Time” Stars Amanda Seyfried & Olivia Wilde

Own the rights to these photos? Please contact us immediately. All rights owned by respective magazines & photographers.

As you guys know, among all huge releases hitting theaters today, the beautiful duo Olivia Wilde & Amanda Seyfried star in the sci-fi triller “In Time,” which also stars Justin Timberlake. Amanda plays J.T.’s love interest & Olivia is his mom—makes more sense after you read the film’s premise. It’s getting favorable reviews, but with so many frickin’ films out there right now, it’s very difficult to decide which one is worth the $22 (popcorn, film, drink)!

Anyway, in celebration of their new film, we grabbed photo shoots of each chick & put them head to head. As you browse through, it becomes apparent very quickly that Olivia Wilde is extremely comfortable wearing next nothing in front of cameras, while on the other hand, Amanda Seyfried surprisingly doesn’t really do many scandalous shoots. I point that out only because Olivia doesn’t come off as your typical skanky star, but from the looks of the pics, short of straight-up nudity, the sexy “Tron” star will do whatever it takes to make the photographer happy.

View All Photos ›

36 comments
Peccavi
Peccavi

amanda is pretty plain jane compared to olivia... also, does she have some sort of animal fetish? wtf?

KobeBryan
KobeBryan

I wish Amanda played the mom in the movie instead.

face84
face84

There both very beautiful.

Gabbo
Gabbo

They're both extremely different. This one will go down with people on one side or the other.

Having seen Olivia and met Amanda. My impression is Olivia is sexier, better looking, and better dressed. However, I'm not extremely rich or poor, so I wouldn't get the time of day from her. Commendable on all her causes and 3rd world visiting/helping.

Amanda is like the shy pretty girl next door. Very comfortable in jeans/sweats as she is in dresses. She's even answered all the questions I asked. For the Amanda fans, here's one of my favorite pics I've taken. Works on many levels.

http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/15135_181961682224_728607224_2636709_2390332_n.jpg

Leni
Leni

Not to me.

JonYo
JonYo

Amanda, hands down. Olivia does nothing for me, I find her face to be very strange.

annak
annak

I don't really care for either of them, but amanda is the better of the two. Olivia is meh in the face and body. at least amanda looks slightly interesting.

johnconnor77
johnconnor77

I can't decide... they should lesbian porn, that's what I have decided

The Devil
The Devil

I'm with you

Her face is shaped like Quagmire from "Family Guy" mang.

salma
salma

For your taste for God's sake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

KobeBryan
KobeBryan

That's just how big the gap is in a exaggerated point of view.

Willy Wallace
Willy Wallace

Amanda has big, beautiful eyes and sexy lips.

I don't see Olivia's appeal and her face looks like a geometry problem.

KobeBryan
KobeBryan

Olivia is superior to Amanda is every single way.

Why compare the two is beyond me.

Its like comparing shit to a diamond.

FallenRawToast
FallenRawToast

p.s. OMG there are actually 37 pages, but Moe's site cant fit that many page tabs into the display.

FallenRawToast
FallenRawToast

Yeah seriously, WTF Moe?

You used to be so nice and include 4 or 5 pics per page, now your just fucking us, without even a kiss or some lube.

Nookies
Nookies

My finger is more sore than my wrist. That should not happen.

DocHellbilly
DocHellbilly

Sammich for sure, but if only one, Olivia all the way.

eliza
eliza

Olivia!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Leni
Leni

Olivia. Amanda looks like a frog with tits, has ugly skin and ugly feet.

Cat46
Cat46

Olivia, I love her small boobies and eyes. Plus Amanda is as dumb as a door knob.

Boz
Boz

Amanda all the time for me.

skilligan
skilligan

I go with Amanda because she has great boobs

Melocotón
Melocotón

Hard choice.

But I go with Olivia.

Especially the pic on page 13 is just...oh my!

Teq
Teq

damn that's a close call... Amanda but only because of the boobies, other than that no winner ;)