Brazilian Model Kat Torres delivers festive cheers as she does a Happy New Year photo shoot for 138 Water in Los Angeles. Check her out on Twitter, Facebook and the Kat Torres official website. As a friendly reminder, you can check out all the juicy photoshoots in our 138 Water category.
nrkey johnconnor777 What's wrong? think of Megan Fox before getting the stupid Marilyn Monroe tattoo and after... do you ever wonder why on every movie they cover it up?
nrkey johnconnor777 What's wrong? think of Megan Fox before getting the stupid Marilyn Monroe tattoo and after... do you ever wonder why on every movie they cover it up?
johnconnor777 Lol, what's wrong with some ink? I'm taking a very different approach though. I'm nearly done with a list of characteristics and then i'm assigning maximum points for each. I'll simply be able to tally stuff to get a score. Not sure if it'll make sense but it keeps me off the street.
nrkey johnconnor777
Let's make a scale we can all use as a reference then:
- Candice Swanepoel (out of the scale)
- 10 Victoria Secret A-team Models, Leonardo's Harem & Cate
Beckinsale & Sara Jean Underwood and super hot
swimsuit/playboy/maxim/water138 etc...
- 9 Models-fitness models or some porn stars or extraordinary MILFs
- 8 Wannabe models/facebook/instagram whores (under 30) that occasionally be the hottest girl in a bar/club
- 7 Good looking women Under 30, BMI under 18, single & no kids
- 6 cute women&BMI; under 20 and/or 35+ in good condition
- 5 Meh every day women, not terrible, nothing sexy, your average SUV married woman
- 4 fat women and/or 40+ with high mileage and 2 kids
- 3 obese women and/or 50+, with more than 3 kids, lot of tattoos and plenty of mileage
- 2 morbidly obese women with multiple kids from multiple men, possible multiple divorces
- 1 Morbidly obese feminazi-menhater women with short hair, multiple tattoos,
multiple STDs, multiple kids from unknown fathers and lice
nrkey If that's a 5, how would you rate the creatures you find on Wal Mart or the fat single moms you see on okaycupid?
johnconnor777 We don't have Walmart here. :P I jokingly made this up, but i have to say it's probably not far off. I just don't care for random skanks, especially not with butterfaces.
And yeah, not sure if the scale i came up with works for normal women. It might be amusing to come up with a sort of checklist and see how women posted on here compare. :P
I like her waist, stomach and ass. Don't like face, boobs and legs. 8/10 may be too generous.
lenilovesfeet Yes that middle section is unreal. She is soo skinny but she has that nice boom boom. Like Candice.
I like her waist, stomach and ass. Don't like face, boobs and legs. 8/10 may be too generous.
I like her waist, stomach and ass. Don't like face, boobs and legs. 8/10 may be too generous.
@lenilovesfeet Yes that middle section is unreal. She is soo skinny but she has that nice boom boom. Like Candice.
Ok, let's take the scientific approach:Face: 4/10 (failing grade = 5, -1 for lips)
Body: 9/10 (excellent = 10, -0,5 for lower belly, -0,5 for arms)Legs: 6/10 (good = 8, -1 for calves, -1 for short lower legs)Character/charm: 0/10 (random skank)
That makes her a 5-. Meh.
Ok, let's take the scientific approach:
@nrkey If that's a 5, how would you rate the creatures you find on Wal Mart or the fat single moms you see on okaycupid?
Let's make a scale we can all use as a reference then:
- Candice Swanepoel (out of the scale)
- 10 Victoria Secret A-team Models, Leonardo's Harem & Cate Beckinsale & Sara Jean Underwood and super hot swimsuit/playboy/maxim/water138 etc...
- 9 Models-fitness models or some porn stars or extraordinary MILFs
- 8 Wannabe models/facebook/instagram whores (under 30) that occasionally be the hottest girl in a bar/club
- 7 Good looking women Under 30, BMI under 18, single & no kids
- 6 cute women&BMI; under 20 and/or 35+ in good condition
- 5 Meh every day women, not terrible, nothing sexy, your average SUV married woman
- 4 fat women and/or 40+ with high mileage and 2 kids
- 3 obese women and/or 50+, with more than 3 kids, lot of tattoos and plenty of mileage
- 2 morbidly obese women with multiple kids from multiple men, possible multiple divorces
- 1 Morbidly obese feminazi-menhater women with short hair, multiple tattoos, multiple STDs, multiple kids from unknown fathers and lice
@johnconnor777 We don't have Walmart here. :P I jokingly made this up, but i have to say it's probably not far off. I just don't care for random skanks, especially not with butterfaces.
And yeah, not sure if the scale i came up with works for normal women. It might be amusing to come up with a sort of checklist and see how women posted on here compare. :P
@johnconnor777 Lol, what's wrong with some ink? I'm taking a very different approach though. I'm nearly done with a list of characteristics and then i'm assigning maximum points for each. I'll simply be able to tally stuff to get a score. Not sure if it'll make sense but it keeps me off the street.
@nrkey @johnconnor777 What's wrong? think of Megan Fox before getting the stupid Marilyn Monroe tattoo and after... do you ever wonder why on every movie they cover it up?
I may have blew my load a little early on this one. I'm not feeling her like I first did.
I may have blew my load a little early on this one. I'm not feeling her like I first did.
