Natalie Portman at “A Tale Of Love And Darkness”

17 comments

Natalie Portman

Natalie Portman attended the “A Tale Of Love And Darkness” photocall during the 68th Annual Cannes Film Festival. The film is the directorial debut for Natalie and the film adapatation of an autobiographical novel by Israeli author Amos Oz. Natalie stars as Fania Oz along with Makram Khoury as Halawani.

tagged with , , ,
  • lenilovesfeet

    Pretty, but face looks tired. I’m undecided about her feet, lol

  • nrkey

    I love the over-the-shoulder shot. Like she’s laughing and going: “Yeah, i still got it, bitches.”.

  • curvefan

    lenilovesfeet Do her ankles look too skinny for her legs?

  • DavidH

    nrkey Indeed she does 🙂

  • McP

    She’s probably 5’2″ 99 pounds, So hot and petite.

  • Drew_Monetz

    It’s not possible for a woman to have ankles that are too thin. Nothing like a thin and delicate pair of ankles.

  • Dinodan

    Yeah, the dress is showing off her legs and ass, which how can anyone not like. But to me the dress looks more awkward on Natalie than sexy. I think Natalie looks her best in more classic/elegant dresses.

  • 1st_Class_Army_Sgt

    She’s delicious like a sweet and crunchy knafeh.

  • lenilovesfeet

    Have you seen Tyra Banks ankles? I’d say they are too slim for her legs, she has strong, thick legs and the tiniest ankles I’ve ever seen!
    Having said that, I agree, small ankles are sexy.

  • lenilovesfeet

    Her ankles are fine! Her legs are decent, nothing outstanding about them, but they are not bad. Her feet, I’m not sure if I like them 🙂

  • MoeJackson

    she seems so tired and dated.

  • MoeJackson

    1st_Class_Army_Sgt love that stuff, by the way.

    Honestly, Natalie is the last person that comes to mind when I’m eating that stuff…

  • MoeJackson

    but then again, she did this for SNL so it’s all good:

  • Drew_Monetz

    Haha! When was the last time somebody brought Tyra Banks up? She does have very thin ankles, but she also has HUGE feet. It does look odd.

  • DavidH

    McP Her height is 5′ 3″ short and sweet 😉 😛

  • McP

    DavidH McP

  • McP

    DavidH McP Don’t know why I can’t post a photo. Anyway, I checked celebheights before I posted. There’s good discussuion there as always, I agree with the folks who say 5’2″ and point out she’s shorter than 5’3″ ScarJo.
    Here’s a link to ScarJo in flats and Natalie in heels, same height though Natalie has the footwear advantage. I’m going with 5’2″.
    http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Scarlett+Johansson/Natalie+Portman/Berlinale+2008+Other+Boleyn+Girl+Photo+Call/1WIUC4OMAWH